|
References:
Population (2016): Population (2011):Private dwellings: Dwellings occupied by usual residents: Land area Population Density |
158749 11064464260 57322 4842.44 km² 32.8/km² |
2015 Results - 2015 Prediction
Reference - Pundits’ Guide (2013 Rep. Order)
|
 | Mike Lake ** |
44949 | 65.80% |
 | Jacqueline Biollo |
14660 | 21.50% |
 | Fritz K. Bitz |
6645 | 9.70% |
 | Joy-Ann Hut |
1595 | 2.30% |
 | Brayden Whitlock |
495 | 0.70% |
2011 Results (redistributed)
|
 | |
31196 | 75.57% |
 | |
5892 | 14.27% |
 | |
2364 | 5.73% |
 | |
1688 | 4.09% |
Other | |
142 | 0.34%% |
Component Riding(s) (2003 Representation Order)
|
Edmonton-Leduc
(39.71% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
Wetaskiwin
(30.21% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
Edmonton-Mill Woods-Beaumont
(28.13% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
Vegreville-Wainwright
(1.95% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | 15/09/19 |
A.S. 99.225.32.21 |
Given how the riding's population jumped over 40% in 2011-16, the commission probably used farsighted logic in putting the Edmonton before the Wetaskiwin--though next redraw, we might see something more like Edmonton-Leduc at most. For those same population-growth reasons, I also wouldn't be too quick to call this as a 70-plusser; the Redmontonian bleed from Mill Woods (together with PPC eating at the edge) might even lead to a drop in share over '15. But dropping under *60%* would be a shocker, for sure. |
 | 19/05/19 |
Sam 86.139.26.229 |
For the sake of consistency the commission should've referred to this as Wetaskiwin-Edmonton, as that's more reflective of the riding's large exurban/rural element - and its resulting Conservative strength. |
 | 10/04/19 |
Laurence Putnam 50.68.187.24 |
As Miles Lunn rightly points out, this isn't even really Edmonton. Would be surprised to see the Tories under 70% here. |
 | 23/02/19 |
M. Lunn 174.7.100.252 |
This only includes a tiny portion of Edmonton and is mostly rural so with the Tories likely to do well in Edmonton while run up the margins in rural areas, easy Tory hold. |
|
|