Riding Profile:
| Candidates: |
 |
Marijuana Party |
| DREYER, Tom |
 |
Reform Party |
| GAMBLE, Ron |
 |
Liberal Party |
| JARVIS, Daniel |
 |
Green Party |
| KIRKALDY, Evelyn |
|
Independent |
| MCKENZIE, Chris |
 |
New Democratic Party |
| PATERSON, Sheila |
|
| Incumbent: |
| North Vancouver-Seymour |
|
Daniel Jarvis |
| Previous Result (redistribution): |
|
13064 | 56.29% |
|
6134 | 26.43% |
|
1598 | 6.89% |
| PDA |
1616 | 6.96% |
|
601 | 2.59% |
| Previous Result (old ridings): |
| North Vancouver-Seymour |
|
14165 | 56.35% |
|
6676 | 26.56% |
|
1737 | 6.91% |
| PDA |
1713 | 6.81% |
|
| Census 1996: |
| Population: | 53170 |
| Dev. from Quota: | 12.78% |
| Area (km2): | 383 |
| Pop Density: | 138.83 |
Surrounding Ridings:
Burnaby North
Burquitlam
North Vancouver-Lonsdale
Port Coquitlam-Burke Mountain
Port Moody-Westwood
West Vancouver-Capilano
West Vancouver-Garibaldi
|
Submissions
Submit Information here
|
23/02/01 |
Interested Voter |
Email: |
| Another academic exercise. Libs don't even have to open a campaign office to win here this time. |
|
23/02/01 |
Old North Shore Political Hack |
Email: |
| Let me be the first master-of-the-obvious here -- Dan Jarvis will win this riding by a ridiculously easy margin. He had a massive victory last time, and the Reform factor will be even smaller now. Look for Jarvis to pile up about 70% of the popular vote, or more, by the time it is over... |
|
07/04/01 |
Highland Flood |
Email:jazzpolice_99@yahoo.ca |
| The NDP candidate will be an irrelevant factor, and the Green candidate could conceivably come in second, as this is a riding where the Greens made a decent showing (2.5%) in 1996. |
|
05/05/01 |
DMB |
Email:politics101@telus.net |
| Oh Dan will win very big but my question is for highland junkie - if 2.5% is a respectable showing what does he consider to be a poor showing? |
|
11/05/01 |
LHGP |
Email:right_canada1@hotmail.com |
| This is my riding, unfortunately. Jarvis will win the way he won in '96 and '91, by being a BC Liberal. This riding overwhelmingly votes for the right, federally 50% CA, 7% PC, so we can safely say 60% of the votes here are on the right. Jarvis is actually quite a weak MLA, a poor speaker, and doesn't communicate with the riding the way MP White does. He will win because he's with the right party. I had hoped to vote for a Unity candidate myself, but there isn't one. Without that, that leaves MLA Jarvis and NDP hopeful(less?) Paterson agreeing with each other, which didn't even warrant a trip to an all candidates meeting as far as I was concerned. |
|